Lightsmark : oldie but not posted yet

[Callidus]

As title,

Ligthsmark V 2.0 avaiable here (http://dee.cz/lightsmark/Lightsmark2008.2.0.tar.bz2) includes linux/win32/64

give it a bash at stock and see what you can get


Cal

[ViRuS2k]

I will give it a bash later but i hardly see the point in benching anymore LOL
i have benched my system to death this past 2 weeks, i just want to enjoy my system now hehe :D

[{SAS}TB]

Scrambled load screen then BSOD (with two different GFX cards) - looks like this (and previous versions ) had / have issues with some ATI drivers :(

[David84]

Scrambled load screen then BSOD (with two different GFX cards) - looks like this (and previous versions ) had / have issues with some ATI drivers :(

what drivers did you try? runs fine on the 9.6's im using btw cal any default settings to run this at???

[gurusan]

argh I know I could do so much better if I did not have the world's worst clocking E3120!!! :mad:

http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/1381/59342615.png

[Brad]

Giving it a go now but cba to set back to stock.

[gurusan]

oh we were supposed to do it at stock? :/ why? how boring.

[Brad]

Yah my thoughts exactly. 4Ghz is my stock speed now. Love the song and with my card at stock and CPU @ 4Ghz you beat me by 1fps. :)


http://i220.photobucket.com/albums/dd157/G-StrinG_album/lightmark.jpg

[gurusan]

looks like you will beeat me when you clock your card then. nice

[Brad]

4890 is a bad *** card for the money.

[gurusan]

i found this benchy i did back in Dec 2007...kinda interesting although i forgot what my CPU was :/

most likely a q6600 at 3.6-3.8ghz

http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/3710/temptemptemptemphv5.jpg

[{SAS}TB]

Might be some user error here - I finally got it to run - BUT at the end of the 3rd (?) test "Realtime Radiosity" it drops back to desktop with a "backend.exe has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience"

:(

[gurusan]

positive it's all stable?

[Brad]

TB lets see some quadfire results.

[{SAS}TB]

TB lets see some quadfire results.

lol, I would love to mate, but it aint gonna happen with 2GB of RAM :( - ill have to wait until the rest is back from RMA :S

[Brad]

I think you need some i7 goodness in your life. you got the block right?

[{SAS}TB]

yep, blocks here and wrapped around the x2, cheers, I was tempted with i7 but thought id do a "cheap" interim upgrade with the second x2, but what its cost me with the card, block and new PSU I could have gone i7 :S

The kick in the crotch is not being able to test them (ATM i get worse results with the 2 x2s than with a single :() but the 2g of RAM is looking like the cilprit (hopefully :()

Back on topic iv re-downloaded the bench and same thing regardless of screen res and it BSODs if i try to run "backend.exe" in the X64 folder :S

[{SAS}TB]

oh about the block - I pmd Geordie No1 to ask him to add you as a trusted trader but he said he inst a mod any more - so don't know who is "running" MM ?

[Callidus]

sorry chaps didn't mean card/cpu @ stock I meant the res etc :( bad bad cal

give us a run at 1280 x 1024 settings as per when LM opens then give it your best shot maxxed out ( as per your pwn system )

[{SAS}TB]

/rolls eyes :P

[Callidus]

Sorry I was too busy trying to get my 260 folding ( kept failing WU's )

apol's all round chaps

[Brad]

TB would your CPU be holding your cards back?

[{SAS}TB]

possibly @ 3.6 - but from what I understand you need 2G of RAM to fully utilise a single x2 so not having the other aint helping - hopefully the RAM should be back early next week - in the meantime ill try pushing the CPU a bit :P

[cje]

624.4 fps.

Not good, not bad. That was at 3ghz overclock by the way. I was too lazy to return to stock. SLI enabled, both cards factory overclocked. 760 core, 1890 shader, 2250 memory (mhz).

[{SAS}TB]

4.2 and 850 / 1250:

http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/7996/lightmark.png