DX11 benchmark

[PMM]

{{Content removed}}

[{SAS}TB]

Cool

Ill download and try this when im back on Sunday / Monday

Nice find :)

[Andrew Moore]

I may have a blast too, just obtain a 5770 to "play" with... Going to have me some fun and then sell it on me thinks.

Andy

[{SAS}TB]

Features:



Support of DirectX 9, DirectX 10, DirectX 11 and OpenGL



So nothings stopping everyone having a go - would be interesting to see the DX9/10/11 comparison :D

[system7]

Nice find, PMM. It's rather Roger Dean, isn't it? :thumbs:

http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/7588/dx11bench.jpg (http://img200.imageshack.us/i/dx11bench.jpg/)

http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/9275/dx11bench2.jpg (http://img38.imageshack.us/i/dx11bench2.jpg/)

AA seems to kill it speedwise, but very nice lighting and shadows and physics in DX11. About 40 fps at my res. Will spend some more time trying to figure out what's different fom DX9. :biggrin:

[IainK]

will try this benchmark on both rigs DX9 only though :(

Results:
Rig1 CPU @ 4 X 3.5 + GPU@stock
FPS-24.9
cores-627

man... i need a new GPU :(

anyone else ging to post their results?



(the setting i'm using are:
DX9, 1280x1024 fullscreen, shaders:high, Textures:high, Trilinear, Anisotopy:4x, Occlusion+refraction+volumetric: enabled)

[{SAS}TB]

Im away from home visting family at the mo, but will give it a whirl when I get back Sunday / Monday and try DX9/10 and 11 :)

[wuyanxu]

i'd be very interested in seeing direct comparison of performance and image quality between Dx10 and Dx11, anyone please :)

[Mechanics Fan]

Mine: DX9 everything at stock

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/2109/unigine001.jpg
http://forum.novatech.co.uk/%3Ca%20href=http://img5.imageshack.us/i/unigine001.jpg/%20target=_blank%3E[img=http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/2109/unigine001.th.jpg]%3C/a%3E

[scrivz69]

running dx10.:) http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/860/heavendemobenchmark.jpg (http://img5.imageshack.us/i/heavendemobenchmark.jpg/)

[IainK]

i shall run mine at the same res, you're GTX260's kicks my 8800gts' sore behind :(

EDIT:
that's better, got 36.0FPS in DX9 mode

and is it just me or the the Pentium Dual core system just beat an i7? :S

[David84]

a run i saved last night

http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j41/NCC1717/heaven.jpg

[Martini1991]

Are you guys running tesselation?

[David84]

Are you guys running tesselation?

thats only for dx11 mate

[Phil_]

Apparently this is really nice, and looks amazing.

[David84]

just for kicks a dx11 run

http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j41/NCC1717/heaven-1.jpg

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

i might be wrong but cant you enable tesselation with the ati cards?

[David84]

i might be wrong but cant you enable tessellation with the ati cards?


well the option to enable tessellation is grayed out in dx9-10 only becomes available when you use dx11

[Naphta]

It's abit like watching a CGI film with everything on max :D

http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/1555/heavenbenchmarksettings.png

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

well the option to enable tessellation is grayed out in dx9-10 only becomes available when you use dx11

thats a yes then cos the gtx260 cant even run dx11 where as you could with the 4890's..
david you must max out the settings and compare 4890 crossfire with the 5870 in DX11^^ lol
this is a pretty good bench i like it :)

in DX9 got 58fps score of 1460 so in this one DX10 doesnt give that much of a performance hit
the one below is a DX10 screen
1465

[David84]

ok ill give it a go maxed out


EDIT: my rez only go's upto 1680x1050

http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j41/NCC1717/heaven-2.jpg

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

you know what considering the scaling.. i think that the crossfire 4890's in DX 11 will out perform the 5870

[Martini1991]

http://i.imagehost.org/0482/00048.jpg

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

the lighting effects in thgat image look awesome!! far better than what i was seeing on the DX10 bench

[Martini1991]

Bare in mind it's also using lossy compression.
The benchmark's insane.

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

im still lolling over the fact that DX10.1 cards can run in DX11 mode.... though i might be wrong.. as im using vista not installed W7 just yet lol xD

[David84]

Bare in mind it's also using lossy compression.
The benchmark's insane.


so where's your benchy eh martini? :poke: :D

[sasuk]

The res runs are all over the place at the moment! can we get a fixed res to run this test at? like 1280 by 1024 and 1920 by 1200!

[Naphta]

Right, the default settings: 1280x1024 4xAA 8x AF On High settings.

[scrivz69]

Using Naphta settings and dx10.

http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/600/heavendemo2.jpg (http://img40.imageshack.us/i/heavendemo2.jpg/)

[Naphta]

Using Naphta settings and dx10.

http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/600/heavendemo2.jpg (http://img40.imageshack.us/i/heavendemo2.jpg/)
Also, make it fullscreen sorry :D

[scrivz69]

oh Booger I will try again.


Edit I tried that but I cannot capture a screenshot.

[sasuk]

right, the default settings: 1280x1024 4xaa 8x af on high settings.

thank you!

[David84]

dx11 run with new settings

http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j41/NCC1717/heaven-3.jpg

[sasuk]

Unigine (http://unigine.com/products/unigine/)

Heaven Demo v1.0

FPS:129.8
Scores:3269

Hardware

Binary:Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system:Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 32bit
CPU model:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz
CPU flags:3790MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 SSE42 HTT
GPU model:NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 8.16.11.9107 896Mb

Settings

Render:direct3d10
Mode:1280x1024 4xAA fullscreen
Shaders:high
Textures:high
Filter:trilinear
Anisotropy:8x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction:enabled
Volumetric:enabled

Unigine Corp. (http://unigine.com/) © 2005-2009

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

haha whenever is see your benches sasuk<< it makes me wonder whether or not you'll ever get rid of those gtx260's xD only a worth upgraade would be quad sli/ crossfire 5870's?

ill rerun this later

[sasuk]

haha whenever is see your benches sasuk<< it makes me wonder whether or not you'll ever get rid of those gtx260's xD only a worth upgraade would be quad sli/ crossfire 5870's?

ill rerun this later

LOL i keep changing my mind, i was down novatech today looking at the 5870 sat there in the glass display box, i was thinking umm 2 5870's mastercard... na!

I dont think im going to gain with 2 5870 in crossfire!

[sasuk]

Unigine (http://unigine.com/products/unigine/)

Heaven Demo v1.0

FPS:70.7
Scores:1781

Hardware

Binary:Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system:Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 32bit
CPU model:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz
CPU flags:3790MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 SSE42 HTT
GPU model:NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 8.16.11.9107 896Mb

Settings

Render:direct3d10
Mode:1920x1200 4xAA fullscreen
Shaders:high
Textures:high
Filter:trilinear
Anisotropy:8x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction:enabled
Volumetric:enabled

Unigine Corp. (http://unigine.com/) © 2005-2009

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

LOL i keep changing my mind, i was down novatech today looking at the 5870 sat there in the glass display box, i was thinking umm 2 5870's mastercard... na!

I dont think im going to gain with 2 5870 in crossfire!


how about quadfire?

[system7]

oh Booger I will try again.


Edit I tried that but I cannot capture a screenshot.

ALT-PRTSCRN...then paste into Paint...lol

[Mechanics Fan]

Or failing that; you can always save your benchmark score, open with your browser and then print screen. An example of this is David84's post #21.

[system7]

Right, the default settings: 1280x1024 4xAA 8x AF On High settings.

CPU E5400 3.3GHz, HD 4770 card.

http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/8328/unigine1280x1024.jpg (http://img35.imageshack.us/i/unigine1280x1024.jpg/)

Be interested to see if this really uses 4 cores, which is something DX11 promises. lol

[Brad]

Well card at stock and CPU at 4Ghz there was no way it was playable all maxed out. I feel a new card is in order if nvidia bring out anything decent.

http://i552.photobucket.com/albums/jj339/oggiet/awdawdawdawd-1.jpg

[Brad]

And at the settings posted in last page.

CPU @ 4Ghz and GTX285 mild clocks.

http://i552.photobucket.com/albums/jj339/oggiet/awdawdadawd.jpg

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

brad they say different resolutions?


edit
ok im being special tongiht ignore me. xD

[David84]

brad they say different resolutions?


edit
ok im being special tongiht ignore me. xD

lol :ninja: edit

[system7]

Here's a DX11 improvement, the dragon and boulders in the road are more 3D and detailed:

DX10:
http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/5044/dragondx10.jpg (http://img8.imageshack.us/i/dragondx10.jpg/)

DX11:
http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/1537/dragondx11.jpg (http://img40.imageshack.us/i/dragondx11.jpg/)

This must be hardware tesselation. :)

[David84]

he looks a lot more spikey in dx11

[system7]

Here's some more tesselation, this time in the detail and 3d quality on the wall and road and rooves:

DX10:
http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/3523/roaddx10.jpg (http://img98.imageshack.us/i/roaddx10.jpg/)

DX11:
http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/7588/dx11bench.jpg

[scrivz69]

Quite a bit of difference in the pictures Steve.I ain't buying one lol.But very tempted.:rolleye:

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

its a lot of difference actually.. very noticeable..

[David84]

just had a check and even tho it runs in dx11 and ive got tessellation enabled it doesnt run on my cards so looks like a 5000 series only feature

[scrivz69]

its a lot of difference actually.. very noticeable..

Your eyes ain't as old as mine lol.:curse:

[system7]

FWIW, I couldn't see ANY difference between DX10 and DX9, but I think we knew that. I think DX10 is better at water though. lol

DX9:
http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/850/roadsdx9.jpg (http://img269.imageshack.us/i/roadsdx9.jpg/)

DX10:
http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/3523/roaddx10.jpg

[{SAS}TB]

Nice BM and some reassly nice effects (althoughnot sure of some of the DOF, but hey ho :))

Did a few runs (spec as sig - GPU @ stock) - the result which stands out for me (and I ran it twice) was the highlighted run @ 1024*768 and the hit in FPS that TEssilation appears to give @ low res

Ill do some more later :D

http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/6236/dx11.png

[wuyanxu]

wow, thanks steve. large visual improvements offered by tesselation.

can't wait to see what sort of GPGPU advantages Fermi brings to the table, but also very tempted by 5870's "available now" and 27w idle.

[Jasonkruys]

FWIW, I couldn't see ANY difference between DX10 and DX9, but I think we knew that. I think DX10 is better at water though. lol



The smoke out of the chimney is quite a bit different :tongue:

[David84]

ok i hope no one minds but i did a chart for the bench only included default settings please let me know what you think


Heaven Demo V1.0
default settings: 1280x1024 4xAA 8x AF On High settings full screen enabled

graphics: DX version: cpu: fps: score: user:
3 GTX 260's sli DX10 i7 920 129.8 3269 sasuk
4890's XF DX11 p2 955 74.1 1866 David84
GTX 285 DX10 i7 920 54.2 1365 Brad
5770 DX11 E5400 23.0 579 system7

[Brad]

Chart is fine dude.

[David84]

cheers bud, if no one has any objections i dont mind keeping this bechmark up to date

[Brad]

Problem is PMM has the OP which results and default settings should be kept in.

[David84]

true hmm looks like it's down to pmm then i dont mind doing the tables if he doesn't mind updating the op once in a while

[Naphta]

http://img154.imageshack.us/img154/1555/heavenbenchmarksettings.png
http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/5713/41714459.png

At settings and hardware in sig.
http://img20.imageshack.us/i/41714459.png/

[David84]

cheers naphta ill add you to the table


Heaven Demo V1.0
default settings: 1280x1024 4xAA 8x AF On High settings full screen enabled

graphics: DX version: cpu: fps: score: user:
3 GTX 260's sli DX10 i7 920 129.8 3269 sasuk
4890's XF DX11 p2 955 74.1 1866 David84
5850 DX10 i7 920 58.0 1416 Naphta
GTX 285 DX10 i7 920 54.2 1365 Brad
5850 DX11 17 920 33.7 848 Naphta
5770 DX11 E5400 23.0 579 system7

[stawte]

Nobody said which settings should be used. But I had a go.

[David84]

Right, the default settings: 1280x1024 4xAA 8x AF On High settings.


Nobody said which settings should be used. But I had a go.

they where on page 2 also there in the table i made

[Lord_x]

http://picture.im/images/heaven.jpg

[sasuk]

Didnt think it would be long till you ran them 295's mark! lol

last run!

Unigine (http://unigine.com/products/unigine/)

Heaven Demo v1.0

FPS:132.2
Scores:3330

Hardware

Binary:Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system:Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 32bit
CPU model:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz
CPU flags:3790MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 SSE42 HTT
GPU model:NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 8.16.11.9107 896Mb

Settings

Render:direct3d10
Mode:1280x1024 4xAA fullscreen
Shaders:high
Textures:high
Filter:trilinear
Anisotropy:8x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction:enabled
Volumetric:enabled

Unigine Corp. (http://unigine.com/) © 2005-2009

[Lord_x]

http://picture.im/images/capture.jpg

[system7]

Continuing my comparative look at DX9, versus DX10 and DX11:

Familiar jaggy look to vegetation in DX9, looks like it needs anti-aliasing:
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/1893/grassesdx9.jpg (http://img96.imageshack.us/i/grassesdx9.jpg/)
DX11, which is not disimilar to DX10 on this one:
http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/1854/grassesdx11.jpg (http://img9.imageshack.us/i/grassesdx11.jpg/)

I do notice that 4XAA exacts a 25% hit in DX11, but is hardly necessary anyway. More concerning is Tesselation exacts a 33% hit in framerate. I can get 30 fps at 1280X1024 or similar 1440X900, but the HD 5770 looks like it will disappoint at 1680x1050 and above. People with big monitors are going to be wanting to look at the HD5850 and HD5870, I reckon.

[{SAS}TB]

Open GL

http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/6541/opengl.png

DX9

http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/5614/dx9.png

DX10

http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/1255/dx10f.png

DX 11 (No Tesselation)

http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/4687/dx11notess.png

DX11 (With Tesselation)

http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/7584/dx11withtess.png

[cje]

Do you guys want me to run dx 9 and 10 just for laughs? I could do a run after my motherboard is back from RMA.

[system7]

I think we should be losing AA for this one. I get this bench at a barely smooth 30 FPS at 1440X900 on a HD 5770 and 3.3 GHz E5400.

http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/4826/unigine1440x900.jpg (http://img183.imageshack.us/i/unigine1440x900.jpg/)

How do you do at your native res, {SAS}TB?

[{SAS}TB]

http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/6236/dx11.png

There are some 1920x1200 in the above - ill try some without the AA tomorrow :D

[David84]

chart update


Heaven Demo V1.0
default settings: 1280x1024 4xAA 8x AF On High settings full screen enabled

graphics: DX version: cpu: fps: score: user:
2 GTX 295's sli DX10 i7 920 165.3 4165 Lord_x
3 GTX 260's sli DX10 i7 920 132.2 3330 sasuk
5870 DX9 i7 920 79.2 1996 {SAS}TB
4890's XF DX11(w/o) p2 955 74.1 1866 David84
5870 DX11(w/o) i7 920 65.1 1640 {SAS}TB
5870 DX10 i7 920 64.9 1634 {SAS}TB
4870x2 DX10 E8400 64.7 1629 stawte
5850 DX10 i7 920 58.0 1416 Naphta
5870 Open GL i7 920 54.7 1378 {SAS}TB
GTX 285 DX10 i7 920 54.2 1365 Brad
5870 DX11(w) i7 920 37.3 940 {SAS}TB
5850 DX11(w) 17 920 33.7 848 Naphta
5770 DX11(w) E5400 23.0 579 system7



KEY w= with tesselation w/o= with out tesselation

[system7]

36.1 FPS at 1920X1200 looks alright to me on a HD 5870. I think that answers the DX11 question for 24" monitors. :thumbs:

[stawte]

they where on page 2 also there in the table i made

Ok boss, done! :D

[scrivz69]

I still can't print a screen shot on fullscreen.Tried alt-prtsc,pasted it and got a black square,same when I just pressed prtsc,still the same.Thats on a 24 inch monitor but running the required res,any other ideas guy's.

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

I still can't print a screen shot on fullscreen.Tried alt-prtsc,pasted it and got a black square,same when I just pressed prtsc,still the same.Thats on a 24 inch monitor but running the required res,any other ideas guy's.

do you have the latest gpu drivers installed? i remember that something like this happened to me and i would constantly get black prints the problem went with a driver update< so maybe a reinstall?

[David84]

Ok boss, done! :D

cool added you to the table

[David84]

I still can't print a screen shot on fullscreen.Tried alt-prtsc,pasted it and got a black square,same when I just pressed prtsc,still the same.Thats on a 24 inch monitor but running the required res,any other ideas guy's.

try this :)


Or failing that; you can always save your benchmark score, open with your browser and then print screen. An example of this is David84's post #21.

[scrivz69]

Cheers bud,it's fine if I don't run at fullscreen.It could be an NVidia spying on me and cocking it up.:rolleye:

[David84]

Cheers bud,it's fine if I don't run at fullscreen.It could be an NVidia spying on me and cocking it up.:rolleye:


ok the benchmark has it own screenshot key which is F12 you will find the screenshots in my comp, c drive, users, your user name, Unigine Heaven folder hope that helps

[johnckeen]

Thought id give it a shot with my setup.
Weirdly it let me do dx11 and tesselation.
heres mine full everything
http://img38.imagefra.me/img/img38/2/10/26/johnckeen/f_8m_77df5bf.jpg
cool pic i took of dragon
http://img03.imagefra.me/img/img03/2/10/26/johnckeen/f_0m_3296966.jpg

[David84]

does you card support DX10.1 by any chance? also are you going to run the bench with default settings so i can add you to the table?

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

imo.. with widescreen being a standard buy these days i think that 1280x1024 is a silly res and that 1440x900 should be used.. just my thoughts..

also just to note.. DX10 and 9 texture wise are identical but the major difference with DX10 is that DX9 had textured lighting and DX10 used dynamic lighting and its only an effect that can only really be noticed while in game/ but then again < i could be wrong :P what DX11 brings to the table with tesselation is that it can cont and cope with much higher counts of polygons and shapes and lines therefore is able to have shaped 3d objects in which are far more detailed in the third dimension than previously capable before.

personally i can see a massive difference between Dx9 and DX10 observe

DX10
http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv318/I3R0K3N7FEET/Untitledg.jpg

DX9
http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv318/I3R0K3N7FEET/Untitled-13.jpg

and heres a stock run at the settings used :)

Unigine (http://unigine.com/products/unigine/)

Heaven Demo v1.0

FPS:38.1
Scores:959

Hardware

Binary:Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system:Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 64bit
CPU model:AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor
CPU flags:3210MHz MMX+ 3DNow!+ SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A HTT
GPU model:ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series 8.01.01.961 1024Mb

Settings

Render:direct3d10
Mode:1280x1024 4xAA fullscreen
Shaders:high
Textures:high
Filter:trilinear
Anisotropy:8x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction:enabled
Volumetric:enabled

Unigine Corp. (http://unigine.com/) © 2005-2009

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

Thought id give it a shot with my setup.
Weirdly it let me do dx11 and tesselation.
heres mine full everything

cool pic i took of dragon


if youre running windows 7 it will allow you to run it with DX11 and it will run with tessellation seemingly on but its not running.

in DX9 i couldnt take a screen shot like scrivs in DX10 i could however, it seems there are some bugs in this bench that need to be ironed out.

[David84]

chart update


Heaven Demo V1.0
default settings: 1280x1024 4xAA 8x AF On High settings full screen enabled

graphics: DX version: cpu: fps: score: user:
2 GTX 295's sli DX10 i7 920 165.3 4165 Lord_x
3 GTX 260's sli DX10 i7 920 132.2 3330 sasuk
5870 DX9 i7 920 79.2 1996 {SAS}TB
4890's XF DX11(w/o) P2 955 74.1 1866 David84
5870 DX11(w/o) i7 920 65.1 1640 {SAS}TB
5870 DX10 i7 920 64.9 1634 {SAS}TB
4870x2 DX10 E8400 64.7 1629 stawte
5850 DX10 i7 920 58.0 1416 Naphta
5870 Open GL i7 920 54.7 1378 {SAS}TB
GTX 285 DX10 i7 920 54.2 1365 Brad
4890 DX10 P2 955 38.1 959 death9000
5870 DX11(w) i7 920 37.3 940 {SAS}TB
5850 DX11(w) 17 920 33.7 848 Naphta
5770 DX11(w) E5400 23.0 579 system7



KEY w= with tesselation w/o= with out tesselation


lol tony whats with that dx9 ss it looks like someone made it in paint

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

this is a very.. something limited benchmark. with a cpu oc to 3.8 and gpu oc to 960 i increased the fps in the bench by 1

i thought i saved the result but the exact fps was 39.9 with my cpu at 3.8 and 4890 at 950 core.

i think there must be a glitch of some kind when i tried to run DX9, ive just installed the driver so maybe i need to reinstall it or make sure all that nvidia stuff is off my pc or something

not really much of a performance hit maxed out at stock actually im confused about this< :S only a 2-3 fps hit when maxed out at higher res? whhaaat? :S

Unigine (http://unigine.com/products/unigine/)

Heaven Demo v1.0

FPS:35.5
Scores:894

Hardware

Binary:Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system:Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 64bit
CPU model:AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor
CPU flags:3210MHz MMX+ 3DNow!+ SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A HTT
GPU model:ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series 8.01.01.961 1024Mb

Settings

Render:direct3d10
Mode:1920x1200 fullscreen
Shaders:high
Textures:high
Filter:trilinear
Anisotropy:16x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction:enabled
Volumetric:enabled

Unigine Corp. (http://unigine.com/) © 2005-2009

[David84]

might be a good idea to run driver sweeper or something similar also is you dx9 up to date?

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

well im running vista and i keep most things up to date.. not had any updates for Dx9.0c though i play a fair few DX9 games so it cant be that... its prob just a glitch ill uninstall the bench and reinstall see if that helps..

EDIT<< yeh uninistalling and reinstalling helped.. you gotta realised i installed this with the gtx260 in and then swapped to the 4890.. not sure how that can affect it but it might have been the cause.

ps< what games have unigine been used to make?

edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unigine

this is one to look out for those who are running linux too by the looks of it.

[David84]

the newest version was released on the 16 of sept i think its updated bi-monthly or something like that

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=2da43d38-db71-4c1b-bc6a-9b6652cd92a3&displaylang=en

[johnckeen]

i cant run 1280x1024 because my screen/tv wont support it. So can you add me with an exception to the list :D

Plus i would love someone to do a test with dx9 on 7, ista and xp and see which is better ;)

[Ryan220]

Heres mine running windowed

i5 @ 3.6

4890

Win 7

67.5 fps

[Naphta]

Heres mine running windowed

i5 @ 3.6

4890

Win 7

67.5 fps
Wrong settings, it also has be fullscreen

[IainK]

Res 1280x1024, max setting 8XAF and 4XAA

FPS 18.0
Scores:454
DX9 Windows XP
CPU:4X3.5Ghz
GPU: 8800gts 320mb OC'ed to 650/1400/1000

EDIT: was i meant to run at stock speeds? also can provide screenshot at request, just cba atm :P

[Ryan220]

I did a re-run - (hopefully at the right settings)

Stock i5

4890

Win 7

40.3 Fps

[Sybex]

My results, not that good I dont think

[{SAS}TB]

How do you do at your native res, {SAS}TB?


Sorry it took a while, I got a tad carried away :D

http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/2164/sastbheaven.png

[Lord_x]

http://picture.im/images/capture.png

Just bought & installed windows 7 (from novatech)

a little faster than vista :trophy:

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

Sorry it took a while, I got a tad carried away :D

http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/2164/sastbheaven.png


im freaking out.. how the **** did i beat your DX10 score maxed out with a 4890 and p2 955 at stock? :S

http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv318/I3R0K3N7FEET/Untitled-14.jpg

btw< it was aa x16 and af x16

[{SAS}TB]

No idea mate, although I hvae noticed that the becnh doesnt seem to increase with an overclocked GPU, ill try dropping the CPU back to stock (just quickly :P) to see how that effects things :D

[system7]

You've only got to look at the bench to know it's GPU limited. Oveclocking CPU isn't going to help unless you have twin big cards.

Tesselation obviously hogs all the GPU resources. AA just slows things down here. DX11 is great tech anyway. :D

[{SAS}TB]

well first off, apologies it it should be 8xAA and 16xAF :P

Dropped the CPU back to stock and get 32.4 FPS !!!

So looks like a CPU overclock (quite a large one at that doesnt give a massive difference in score - as with the GPU :S)

The only other thing I can think of is your on Fista and me W7 :confused:

Edit Steve beat me to it :P

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

with my OC scores i found that gpu AND CPU OC does virtually nothing


well first off, apologies it it should be 8xAA and 16xAF :P

Dropped the CPU back to stock and get 32.4 FPS !!!

So looks like a CPU overclock (quite a large one at that doesnt give a massive difference in score - as with the GPU :S)

The only other thing I can think of is your on Fista and me W7 :confused:

Edit Steve beat me to it :P

ok idk what the settings were they were MAx whatever, ive not installed it snice ive been having probsds with my W7 install.. IMO it seems that W7 Rc was actually better that the final version

[David84]

chart update


Heaven Demo V1.0
default settings: 1280x1024 4xAA 8x AF On High settings full screen enabled

graphics: DX version: cpu: fps: score: user:
2 GTX 295's sli DX10 i7 920 168.5 4244 Lord_x
3 GTX 260's sli DX10 i7 920 132.2 3330 sasuk
5870 DX9 i7 920 79.2 1996 {SAS}TB
4890's XF DX11(w/o) P2 955 74.1 1866 David84
5870 DX11(w/o) i7 920 65.1 1640 {SAS}TB
5870 DX10 i7 920 64.9 1634 {SAS}TB
4870x2 DX10 E8400 64.7 1629 stawte
5850 DX10 i7 920 58.0 1416 Naphta
GTX275 OC DX10 i7 920 55.2 1391 Sybex
5870 Open GL i7 920 54.7 1378 {SAS}TB
GTX 285 DX10 i7 920 54.2 1365 Brad
4890 OC DX10 i5 750 40.3 1015 Ryan220
4890 DX10 P2 955 38.1 959 death9000
5870 DX11(w) i7 920 37.3 940 {SAS}TB
5850 DX11(w) 17 920 33.7 848 Naphta
5770 DX11(w) E5400 23.0 579 system7
8800GTS 320mb DX9 QX6850 18.0 545 IainK



KEY w= with tessellation w/o= with out tessellation
sorry i haven't updated quicker but i formatted the wrong partition last night :durr::wall:

[{SAS}TB]

with my OC scores i found that gpu AND CPU OC does virtually nothing

Aye no real difference to speak of - What drivers you on ?


chart update

Cheers :D

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

latest driverrrs< but as i said iv not installed the unigne since installing W7, i hoped to run a DX11 try but atm im too busy sorting my install out.. though IDK i might just rip out W7 ATM as its not really doing it for me last night i left steam installing some games but i awoke to a complete FAIL and i think my mobo bios crashed too i had to reset the cmos jumpers and do a system restore and since then steam hasnt been working and its bugging me esp cos my connex is well slow and it takes forever just to install the bladdy games!! <<< RRAGE

also < with the OC ok about 2-3 fps? IMO for a major cpu and gpu OC thats not really cutting it ESP cos i can now get my 955 stable @ 4ghz!

[Cnr]

Would it be normal for the scores to be virtually similar when ran using either DX10 or DX11?

http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd203/cnr_5/as.jpg

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

Would it be normal for the scores to be virtually similar when ran using either DX10 or DX11?




i think that with the 4800 series you dont get the performance hit of tesselation and i think it used the DX10.1 feature so it works out the same

[Cnr]

i think that with the 4800 series you dont get the performance hit of tesselation and i think it used the DX10.1 feature so it works out the same

I guess that does make sense. Anyway here is the DX10 run.
http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd203/cnr_5/as1.jpg

[David84]

chart update

Heaven Demo V1.0
default settings: 1280x1024 4xAA 8x AF On High settings full screen enabled

graphics: DX version: cpu: fps: score: user:
2 GTX 295's sli DX10 i7 920 168.5 4244 Lord_x
3 GTX 260's sli DX10 i7 920 132.2 3330 sasuk
4890's XF DX11(w/o) P2 955 79.7 2007 David84
5870 DX9 i7 920 79.2 1996 {SAS}TB
5870 DX11(w/o) i7 920 65.1 1640 {SAS}TB
5870 DX10 i7 920 64.9 1634 {SAS}TB
4870x2 DX10 E8400 64.7 1629 stawte
5850 DX10 i7 920 58.0 1416 Naphta
GTX275 OC DX10 i7 920 55.2 1391 Sybex
5870 Open GL i7 920 54.7 1378 {SAS}TB
GTX 285 DX10 i7 920 54.2 1365 Brad
4890 OC DX10 i5 750 40.3 1015 Ryan220
4890 DX10 P2 955 38.1 959 death9000
5870 DX11(w) i7 920 37.3 940 {SAS}TB
4800??? DX10 E6750 36.4 917 Cnr
4800??? DX11(w/o) E6750 36.3 913 Cnr
5850 DX11(w) 17 920 33.7 848 Naphta
5770 DX11(w) E5400 23.0 579 system7
8800GTS 320mb DX9 QX6850 18.0 545 IainK



KEY w= with tesselation w/o= with out tesselation
managed to eek out a few more fps

http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j41/NCC1717/heaven-4.jpg

[system7]

Here's a score to complete the DX10 table David.

HD5770, E5400 3.3GHz:

1280X1024 DX10 4AA 8AF tesselation 34.3 864

I've already got 1440X900 DX11 0AA 4AF Tesselation 30.0 757

{SAS}TB has 1920X1200 DX11 0AA 4AF Tesselation 35.1 884

Reckon we just need Naptha at Native Res and a few HD 48XX DX10 scores at your stock 1280X1024 4AA 8AF settings to complete the picture. :D

Anybody got a HD 5750?

[David84]

chart update


Heaven Demo V1.0
default settings: 1280x1024 4xAA 8x AF On High settings full screen enabled

graphics: DX version: cpu: fps: score: user:
2 GTX 295's sli DX10 i7 920 168.5 4244 Lord_x
3 GTX 260's sli DX10 i7 920 132.2 3330 sasuk
4890's XF DX11(w/o) P2 955 79.7 2007 David84
5870 DX9 i7 920 79.2 1996 {SAS}TB
5870 DX11(w/o) i7 920 65.1 1640 {SAS}TB
5870 DX10 i7 920 64.9 1634 {SAS}TB
4870x2 DX10 E8400 64.7 1629 stawte
5850 DX10 i7 920 58.0 1416 Naphta
GTX275 OC DX10 i7 920 55.2 1391 Sybex
5870 Open GL i7 920 54.7 1378 {SAS}TB
GTX 285 DX10 i7 920 54.2 1365 Brad
4890 OC DX10 i5 750 40.3 1015 Ryan220
4890 DX10 P2 955 38.1 959 death9000
5870 DX11(w) i7 920 37.3 940 {SAS}TB
4800??? DX10 E6750 36.4 917 Cnr
4800??? DX11(w/o) E6750 36.3 913 Cnr
5770 DX10 E5400 34.3 864 system7
5850 DX11(w) 17 920 33.7 848 Naphta
5770 DX11(w) E5400 23.0 579 system7
8800GTS 320mb DX9 QX6850 18.0 545 IainK



KEY w= with tesselation w/o= with out tesselation

[{SAS}TB]

http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/9979/45051297.png

Eeeked a few more FPS :D

[David84]

nice one mate


Heaven Demo V1.0
default settings: 1280x1024 4xAA 8x AF On High settings full screen enabled

graphics: DX version: cpu: fps: score: user:
2 GTX 295's sli DX10 i7 920 168.5 4244 Lord_x
3 GTX 260's sli DX10 i7 920 132.2 3330 sasuk
5870 DX9 i7 920 82.0 2066 {SAS}TB
4890's XF DX11(w/o) P2 955 79.7 2007 David84
5870 DX11(w/o) i7 920 65.1 1640 {SAS}TB
5870 DX10 i7 920 64.9 1634 {SAS}TB
4870x2 DX10 E8400 64.7 1629 stawte
5850 DX10 i7 920 58.0 1416 Naphta
GTX275 OC DX10 i7 920 55.2 1391 Sybex
5870 Open GL i7 920 54.7 1378 {SAS}TB
GTX 285 DX10 i7 920 54.2 1365 Brad
4890 OC DX10 i5 750 40.3 1015 Ryan220
4890 DX10 P2 955 38.1 959 death9000
5870 DX11(w) i7 920 37.3 940 {SAS}TB
4800??? DX10 E6750 36.4 917 Cnr
4800??? DX11(w/o) E6750 36.3 913 Cnr
5770 DX10 E5400 34.3 864 system7
5850 DX11(w) 17 920 33.7 848 Naphta
5770 DX11(w) E5400 23.0 579 system7
8800GTS 320mb DX9 QX6850 18.0 545 IainK



KEY w= with tessellation w/o= with out tessellation

[Cnr]

Just noticed that I didn't say what my card is it is a Sapphire Toxic 1GB 4870. Also managed to gain some more fps.
http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd203/cnr_5/as2.jpg

[Martini1991]

Are any of you using tesselation?

[{SAS}TB]

nice one mate

Thanks :)


Are any of you using tesselation?

Yeah, look over some of the individual posts - Ive done a full hit of 1920x1200 rund @ DX9,10,11 with and without tesselation ;)

And a small increase :D

http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/966/49521578.png

[Martini1991]

This benchmark's stupidly CPU limited.

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

This benchmark's stupidly CPU limited.


its not either LOL Ocing cpu and OCing gpu i found like little improvement

[Martini1991]

its not either LOL Ocing cpu and OCing gpu i found like little improvement
My GPU's clocked WAY higher than Sas's, yet he gets 30 FPS more on average lol..

[David84]

chart update


Heaven Demo V1.0
default settings: 1280x1024 4xAA 8x AF On High settings full screen enabled

graphics: DX version: cpu: fps: score: user:
2 GTX 295's sli DX10 i7 920 168.5 4244 Lord_x
3 GTX 260's sli DX10 i7 920 132.2 3330 sasuk
5870 DX9 i7 920 82.1 2069 {SAS}TB
4890's XF DX11(w/o) P2 955 79.7 2007 David84
5870 DX11(w/o) i7 920 65.1 1640 {SAS}TB
5870 DX10 i7 920 64.9 1634 {SAS}TB
4870x2 DX10 E8400 64.7 1629 stawte
5850 DX10 i7 920 58.0 1416 Naphta
GTX275 OC DX10 i7 920 55.2 1391 Sybex
5870 Open GL i7 920 54.7 1378 {SAS}TB
GTX 285 DX10 i7 920 54.2 1365 Brad
4890 OC DX10 i5 750 40.3 1015 Ryan220
4870 1GB DX10 E6750 38.2 961 Cnr
4890 DX10 P2 955 38.1 959 death9000
5870 DX11(w) i7 920 37.3 940 {SAS}TB
4870 1GB DX11(w/o) E6750 36.3 913 Cnr
5770 DX10 E5400 34.3 864 system7
5850 DX11(w) 17 920 33.7 848 Naphta
5770 DX11(w) E5400 23.0 579 system7
8800GTS 320mb DX9 QX6850 18.0 545 IainK



KEY w= with tessellation w/o= with out tessellation

[{SAS}TB]

Would be interesting to see how Lord_X and sasuk's rigs perform with a single GPU to see how this bench scales with SLI :D

Similar with David84's rig and a single 4890 against the SLI :D

[David84]

just for {SAS}TB

http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j41/NCC1717/heaven-5.jpg


Heaven Demo V1.0
default settings: 1280x1024 4xAA 8x AF On High settings full screen enabled

graphics: DX version: cpu: fps: score: user:
2 GTX 295's sli DX10 i7 920 168.5 4244 Lord_x
3 GTX 260's sli DX10 i7 920 132.2 3330 sasuk
5870 DX9 i7 920 82.1 2069 {SAS}TB
4890's XF DX11(w/o) P2 955 79.7 2007 David84
5870 DX11(w/o) i7 920 65.1 1640 {SAS}TB
5870 DX10 i7 920 64.9 1634 {SAS}TB
4870x2 DX10 E8400 64.7 1629 stawte
5850 DX10 i7 920 58.0 1416 Naphta
GTX275 OC DX10 i7 920 55.2 1391 Sybex
5870 Open GL i7 920 54.7 1378 {SAS}TB
GTX 285 DX10 i7 920 54.2 1365 Brad
4890 OC DX10 i5 750 40.3 1015 Ryan220
4870 1GB DX10 E6750 38.2 961 Cnr
4890 DX11(w/o) P2 955 38.1 960 David84
4890 DX10 P2 955 38.1 959 death9000
5870 DX11(w) i7 920 37.3 940 {SAS}TB
4870 1GB DX11(w/o) E6750 36.3 913 Cnr
5770 DX10 E5400 34.3 864 system7
5850 DX11(w) 17 920 33.7 848 Naphta
5770 DX11(w) E5400 23.0 579 system7
8800GTS 320mb DX9 QX6850 18.0 545 IainK



KEY w= with tessellation w/o= with out tessellation

[{SAS}TB]

Thanks mate

So looks like you get a real nice improvement with Crossfire :D

And you nV boys ? ;)

[Lord_x]

Would be interesting to see how Lord_X and sasuk's rigs perform with a single GPU to see how this bench scales with SLI :D

Similar with David84's rig and a single 4890 against the SLI :D


just for you {SAS}TB 1x 295 gtx :rolleye:

thats 70fps gain with another 295 in quad pretty awesome gain! im really suprised it scales so well.

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/751/50113309.png

[{SAS}TB]

Cheers :D

Yeah definately looks like this bench scales well with dual (or more) GPUs of either flavour :)

[sasuk]

Ran the test with a 260, 260 sli and tri 260 sli all on same settings

260
http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/7463/99273100.jpg

260 sli
http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/7876/capture2bc.jpg

tri 260 sli
http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/7471/63955260.jpg

[{SAS}TB]

Cheers matey

Very interesting indeed :D

Ive never seen any other bench benefit or scale so well with multiple GPUs :thumbs:

[Lord_x]

my last and final test :D

http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/120/1691.png

MAXED OUT
http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/1263/maxed.png

[stawte]

Crossfire on and off.:cool:

[system7]

I did some testing on this bench in Task Manager, and found it surprisingly only uses 20% of the CPU on my dual. Terran Conflict or STALKER use 60-70% by comparison. Clearly very GPU limited, which explains the good SLI and Crossfire performance scaling.

Anyway, onto my point. Clearly DX11 and AA is impacting GPU performance quite hard here:


Heaven Demo V1.0
default settings: 1280x1024 4xAA 8x AF On High settings full screen enabled

graphics: DX version: cpu: fps: score: user:

HD 4890 DX10 P2 955 38.1 959 death9000
HD 4870 DX10 E6750 38.2 961 cnr

HD 5770 DX10 E5400 34.3 864 system7
HD 5850 DX10 i7 920 58.0 1416 Naphta
HD 5870 DX10 i7 920 64.9 1634 {SAS}TB

HD 5770 DX11 E5400 23.0 579 system7
HD 5850 DX11 17 920 33.7 848 Naphta
HD 5870 DX11 i7 920 37.3 940 {SAS}TB

Full res. results:

HD 5770
1440X900 (0AA, 4AF) DX11 E5400 30.0 757 system7

HD 5770 (Windowed)
1920X1200 (0AA, 4AF) DX11 E5400 22.1 556 system7

HD 5870
1920X1200 (0AA, 4AF) DX11 i7 920 35.1 884 {SAS}TB

Whilst the HD 5770 matches a HD 4870 in DX10, when you turn on Tesselation, the framerate drops quite badly. 16 fps minimum is really quite awful and juddery at 1920X1200 on a HD 5770. I have a feeling that you may want to crossfire HD 5770 or HD 5750 at 1920X1200 in DX11 games. Happily, the HD 5770 seems a good match for my 1440X900 monitor. :cool:

[Mr. Orange]

erm =/
http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/7997/erm.png

[system7]

erm =/
http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/7997/erm.png

Reinstall/update Catalyst, I'd think...lol

[Mr. Orange]

Reinstall/update Catalyst, I'd think...lol
Reinstalled CCC 9.10... still the same error.. me thinks i wait for windows 7 ultimate to arrive

[system7]

Seems to be a sound error:


I figured it out. Seems my X-Fi card was in "Entertainment" mode which disables hardware 3D sound extensions. Switched to "Game Mode" and it works fine.

Bit of hacking around to do there, I think...lol

[Mr. Orange]

Seems to be a sound error:



Bit of hacking around to do there, I think...lol

Steve, i love you :D
thanks, same problem for me :)

[stawte]

OpenAL??? Maybe....

[Mr. Orange]

DX11 does look amazing.
after i OC to 4Ghz, and maybe OC Graphics Card a bit, I'll run in 1920x1080, 16x AF, 8x AA with Tessellation. and put some screenshots up. :D
http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/8937/91523671.png

[system7]

DX11 does look amazing.
after i OC to 4Ghz, and maybe OC Graphics Card a bit, I'll run in 1920x1080, 16x AF, 8x AA with Tessellation. and put some screenshots up. :D

m8 you're not running DX11 on a HD 4870 card...lol

Here's some more DX11 tesselation, this time in the detail and 3d quality on the wall and road and rooves:

DX10:
http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/3523/roaddx10.jpg (http://img98.imageshack.us/i/roaddx10.jpg/)

DX11:
http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/7588/dx11bench.jpg

[Mr. Orange]

m8 you're not running DX11 on a HD 4870 card...lol


http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/6236/dx11.png
:confused:

[system7]

LOL, if you get spines on your dragon, I'll eat my hat...:D

Here's a DX11 improvement, the dragon and boulders in the road and the steps and roofs are more 3D and detailed:

DX10:
http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/5044/dragondx10.jpg (http://img8.imageshack.us/i/dragondx10.jpg/)

DX11:
http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/1537/dragondx11.jpg (http://img40.imageshack.us/i/dragondx11.jpg/)

This is hardware tesselation. :)

[Mr. Orange]

this doesn't count does it =/
http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/8106/dx10k.png

[Kelvin_C-J]

Here's some results for you:

Same settings as everyone else - default.

Windows XP SP3 DX9.

Windowed: 82.5fps Score: 2097
Fullscreen: 83.4fps Score: 2197

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

i think by running DX11 on a DX10.1 card it takes advantage of a few things but its not full DX11 nor tessellation so there is still a miss though small gains are to be had :D

[David84]

i think they've just patch together DX10.1 and tessellation and said behold a "DX11 benchmark"

[{SAS}TB]

:D

http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/3598/heavenp.png

[Ryan220]

Here's some results for you:

Same settings as everyone else - default.

Windows XP SP3 DX9.

Windowed: 82.5fps Score: 2097
Fullscreen: 83.4fps Score: 2197


I dont think the settings everyone is using are default - at default I scored about 69. On the 'used' settings I got 40'ish


Perhaps the settings should be clearly stated in the forst post, if they arent there already?

[Martini1991]

This benchmark changes your refresh rate to 30HZ at times, I was using Vysnc, it was either 60 or 30FPS...

[enkoda]

FPS: 29.9
Scores: 753
Hardware Binary: Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system: Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 64bit
CPU model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
CPU flags: 3005MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 HTT
GPU model: ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series 8.01.01.961 1024Mb
Render: direct3d11
Mode: 1280x1024 4xAA fullscreen
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Filter: trilinear
Anisotropy: 8x
Occlusion: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Volumetric: enabled

Hmmm...not as high as I was expecting, but I'm still happy!

[stawte]

That is a low score mate. Can it be the CPU that`s limiting you? Prehaps not, is clocked @3Ghz I see....Hmmmm
I`m sure Steve will enlighten us up..

[Martini1991]

It'll be tesselation.

[{SAS}TB]

So, Maxxed Out @ 1920 X 1200:

DX9
http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/5204/hdx9.png

DX10
http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/3583/hdx10.png

DX11 (without tesselation)
http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/7396/hdx11none.png

DX11 (with tesselation)
http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/9075/hdx11with.png

[system7]

I think it's unfortunate for the DX11 benchers that we somehow got locked into 4X AA, 8X AF.

AA seems to kill the framerate. I want to see 0X AA, 4X AF, 1920X1200 here:


Heaven Demo V1.0
default settings: 1280x1024 4xAA 8x AF On High settings full screen enabled

graphics: DX version: cpu: fps: score: user:

HD 4890 DX10 P2 955 38.1 959 death9000
HD 4870 DX10 E6750 38.2 961 cnr

HD 5770 DX10 E5400 34.3 864 system7
HD 5850 DX10 i7 920 58.0 1416 Naphta
HD 5870 DX10 i7 920 64.9 1634 {SAS}TB

HD 5770 DX11 E5400 23.0 579 system7
HD 5850 DX11 17 920 33.7 848 Naphta
HD 5870 DX11 i7 920 37.3 940 {SAS}TB

Full res. results:

HD 5770
1440X900 (0AA, 4AF) DX11 E5400 30.0 757 system7

HD 5770 (Windowed)
1920X1200 (0AA, 4AF) DX11 E5400 22.1 556 system7

HD 5870
1920X1200 (0AA, 4AF) DX11 i7 920 35.1 884

I' d presume you're going to be nearer 50-60 fps on those settings, Mr. {SAS}TB. What does anisotropic filtering do anyway? lol

[{SAS}TB]

I' d presume you're going to be nearer 50-60 fps on those settings, Mr. {SAS}TB. What does anisotropic filtering do anyway? lol

AF - Pfft ! :P

DX11 1920x1200 with 0xAA and 4xAF WITH tesselation:

http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/7971/sys11with.png

and WITHOUT tesselation

http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/5562/sys11without.png

[system7]

Well, that's spectacular gains from Crossfire! :D

Simple doubling of framerates! w00t

[{SAS}TB]

Eeeked a tad more

http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/1739/heavhigh.png

And by lowering some settings:

http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/363/heaxen.png

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

i think they've just patch together DX10.1 and tessellation and said behold a "DX11 benchmark"


its interesting though as the 48xx cards iirc have tessellators.. maybe ones just not compatible with DX11... :S

ah apparently the 4870 and 4890 have programable tesselators onboard but these tesselators are 15x not the 64x required by DX11< whatever that may mean... shame really as its still a completely unused feature on the ati cards :( i think i want to point the finger at nvidia and MS for that....


just reading some stuff and its possible that in DX11 games in future there may be low medium and high options for tessellation, and in that feature the ati 10.1 cards MAY< be able to run low tessellation if developers are pushed.<- wouldnt get you hopes up about that though

[{SAS}TB]

Bit of a freak run, but ..................


http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/5905/boooyahhhhdx9.png

:D

[{SAS}TB]

Oops got my AA and AF mixed up :P

http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/544/boooyahhhhdx93.png

[Ryan220]

i just ran this again with crossfired 4890s and 8 gig ram at i5 stock speeds and got 90 fps. Dx 10

Very pleased but not quite like Mr SAS though

[ForestPhil]

This is a great demo of what DX11 can do and also tessalation.. only trouble is on step 23.. yeah step 23 of 23 it crashes the machine...******.... Was running at about 45 fps at that point with tessalation on...

Ah well it happens

[Martini1991]

This is a great demo of what DX11 can do and also tessalation.. only trouble is on step 23.. yeah step 23 of 23 it crashes the machine...******.... Was running at about 45 fps at that point with tessalation on...

Ah well it happens
what resolution!? You can't have been running anything above 1280x768

[{SAS}TB]

Sounds like something is overheating :sad:

[ForestPhil]

Worked it out... seems like the High Quality ATI software "Catalyst" is playing silly buggers!!!!!

By default the ATI OverDrive is enabled, which I hadn't noticed and whilst enabled every test eventually crashes...... diable and hey presto it works..... Going ot drop XFX a line to the support crew and see what they have to say.... Yeah, the 45fps in DX11 with tessalation I think was the computer wishing for the best!!!!

So what I have so far is as follows:
DX11 - 30.8 fps SCore 777
DX10 - 34.4 fps Score 867
DX9 - 40.5 fps Score 1021

Thought technology was moving on.. appears it's not as DX11 significantly slower than DX9......

That was as follows:

Binary:Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009

Operating system:Windows 7 (build 7600) 64bit

CPU flags:2799MHz MMX+ 3DNow!+ SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A HTT

GPU model:ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series 8.660.6.0 1024Mb


Mode:1280x1024 4xAA fullscreen

Shaders:high

Textures:high

Filter:trilinear

Anisotropy:8x

Occlusion:enabled

Refraction:enabled

Volumetric:enabled


So this is the stock settings for my system.

Gotta say not very impressed with the ATI driver/software, they seem to crash as soon as you try to do anything with the card......

[stubbs]

I have also recently had a few issues with ati's drivers for my 5770 every now and again i get a message saying display drivers have stopped working i loose my desctop background and screen res then it just seems to work again very odd.this only happens on desktop never in game fortunatly.

[sasuk]

Only just really starting to play around with these two XFX 5850!!!
Ran some test i crossfire cannot beleave how smooth these cards ran, ive had 3 x 260 and quad 295 sli, they dont run as smooth as these two 5850,crysis maxed out 60fps, farcry maxed out over 100fps, dirt 2 DX11 benchmark maxed out avg 72 fps.

overclocked cpu @ 3.9GHz
cards clocked 850/1200

http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/2785/93652315.png

DX 9 1280 by 1024 4xAA 8xAf
http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/2987/56221052.png

DX 10 1280 by 1024 4xAA 8xAF
http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/5955/50742696.png

DX 11 1280 by 1024 4xAA 8xAF
http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/6246/54805561.png

DX 11 1920x 1200 4xAA 8xAF
http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/1913/43889050.png

DX 11 1920 by 1200 with tesselation 4xAA 8xAF
http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/7084/19068214.png

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

I' d presume you're going to be nearer 50-60 fps on those settings, Mr. {SAS}TB. What does anisotropic filtering do anyway? lol


tbh its one of those things you only notice when you know what youre looking for.. you'll wish you never knew after knowing << haha thats what adam said to god im sure...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anisotropic_filtering

[sasuk]

DX 11 1920 x1200 with tesselation 8xAA 16xAF


http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/4521/unigine2010012722245431.png

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

i bet at those specs it looks amazing

[Mechanics Fan]

At 3.5:

http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/1192/dx1135.jpg (http://img692.imageshack.us/i/dx1135.jpg/)

[sasuk]

DX 11 1920 x1200 with tesselation 8xAA 16xAF

I7 920 @ 4.1 3x xfx 5850's @ 950/1200


http://i48.tinypic.com/10qjgns.png

[Martini1991]

NEVERMIND.
Can't wait for my 5850 crossfire now lol, though you're temping me with trifire.