Cinebench multithreaded CPU benchmarking

[wuyanxu]

overclock and run this benchmark. :)
http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=1708

i got 11,605. q6600 at 3.4Ghz, 32bit (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v293/wuyanxu/Untitled-7.jpg) and 13800 with 64bit (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v293/wuyanxu/3ae631fe.jpg)

Ranked results:
http://i44.tinypic.com/23kcdw0.jpg

[mithrandir]

Thanks. Will give this a go when I get home.

[PMM]

4148 single CPU
7928 dual CPU
OpenGL bench = 8631

/edit opps should say ;) normal e8400 @ 3.8Ghz

[scrivz69]

Im last again lol.:(

[Jonny2Bad]

112
open GL 8489
1 cpu 3645
multi 12416

[wuyanxu]

first post updated with ranked results. J2B leading :)

please post your RAM configuration and speeds, i wonder if this test is a pure CPU test or does it also consider combination of RAM and chipset.

[PMM]

Mine is on DDR3... kind of says 560Mhz but I think that translates to 1120Mhz which it seems to show on the bios at startup. timings were funny enough... 5/4/4/15-t1

[wuyanxu]

added scrivz69 and PMM's RAM info, will update when new results come in.

anyone be interested in an highest possible overclocked version of this benchmark??

[mithrandir]

Bottom of the list

OpenGL: 5932
Single CPU: 3175
Multiple CPU: 5978

[/URL][URL="http://img516.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cinebenchhv4.jpg"]http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/6246/cinebenchhv4.th.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Jonny2Bad]

Ok switched everything off and managed a little extra 12856
116

[Brad]

http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i214/bradbrown07_2006/cicebench.jpg

Ram @ 1057mhz
Cpu @ 4.4Ghz

[{SAS}TB]

TBH I have no idea WTF im doing..................
http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/2631/nfies0.png

[wuyanxu]

nice results.

now you can really see the difference:
the difference between 4.4Ghz dual core and 3.4Ghz quad core comes is same as a 200Mhz increase in quad core clocks.

[Soup Dragon]

i got 9372 with my q9300 @2.5GHz, DDR2-800, P35

I probably need to learn how to overclock!!!

[Ash]

So I went to 400 x 9 and it runs. Then I tried this benchamrk and got this:

http://www.theredline.co.uk/random/cb1.jpg

Now need to do some stability testing.

[NeilX90]

On a stock Q9550 (2.9Ghz), P965 board, DDR2-800 I get:

10624

No chance of overclocking with this BIOS...

[cycloneray]

Just pushed it up to 3.6 gig to see what i could get

http://www.cycloneray.co.uk/Cinebench2.JPG

[{SAS}TB]

Another run ;)

http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/7926/nfi2ju0.png

And on Windows 7 :|

http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/1867/nfw7pc7.png

[{SAS}TB]

http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/3063/15177cj7.png

[wuyanxu]

{SAS}TB, what speeds are your CPU at when you achieved 15k?? seems too high for a 24/7 overclock.

thanks for results people, seems that unlike other threads, a lot of quad core people started to benchmark :)

we can clearly see, it takes a dual core at 4.4Ghz watercooled with latest mobo to come close to a quad core at 3Ghz air cooled with a really old mobo.

[{SAS}TB]

{SAS}TB, what speeds are your CPU at when you achieved 15k?? seems too high for a 24/7 overclock

I know mate, sorry, I pushed it up to 3.7 :|

Im gonna drop it back down and see what i can get out of it :D

[{SAS}TB]

Just shy of 15k with my 24/7 3.6 - 400x9 :D

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/67/14947pf2.png

[wuyanxu]

14k+ seems high for 3.6Ghz, as J2B, cyclonray and Ash all have 3.6Ghz while they scored under 13k.

what special tweaks have you done?

[Helior]

8072 multithreaded @3.6Ghz system is in the sig.

The openGL test always stopped responding, couldn't be bothered running again for a screeny!

[{SAS}TB]

You can see Realtemp is showing a 400 multiplier

All i have done have no other apps running and set priority to "Realtime" in Task Manager

The only other thing I can think of is its a 64bit version ?

[Jonny2Bad]

14k+ seems high for 3.6Ghz, as J2B, cyclonray and Ash all have 3.6Ghz while they scored under 13k.

what special tweaks have you done?
64 bit os could be the difference there Wu.

[Ash]

Ran it again with the process priority set to 'high'

http://www.theredline.co.uk/random/cb2.jpg

[Brad]

My mate Pauls entry.

http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i214/bradbrown07_2006/Cinebench.jpg

Spec: Q9650 @ 4.41Ghz @ 1.392v, Asus Rampage Extreme, 4870x2 @850/1000, 2 x 500gb + 250Gb + 80Gb NAS, 4Gb G.Skills DDR3 @ 1569Mhz 7-7-7-18, Asus Xonar DX, TJ-07BW, Custom Water, Dell 2407WFP.

[Jonny2Bad]

64bit seems to really enjoy this benchmark much higher scores.

[cycloneray]

Yea 64 system give out great scores :)

[Brad]

Yea 64 system give out great scores :)

Dude you got any pics of your card yet? No rush if you haven't;)

[wuyanxu]

so J2B isn't using 64bit??

okay, i am going to re-do the table with a new 64bit column.

nice and rounded score, Ash.

edit:
had a second go with the 64bit EXE, scored 2000+ more than 32bit EXE.

first post updated with 64bit or not (those without markers need to tell me what EXE they were running)

[cycloneray]

Hope you got them just pm'ed to u dude


Dude you got any pics of your card yet? No rush if you haven't;)

[Brad]

Im running 64 bit and ya i got the pics dude thx.

[Jonny2Bad]

so J2B isn't using 64bit??
No buddy 32bit xp this had made me very tempted to run the windows 7 64 bit disc ive had laying about here though i must admit. I upped the cpu to high priorty and got 12962. Cant be bothered to add the photo lol but im sure you all trust me.

[Ash]

Yeah, I've got 64bit disc staring right at me now. Should I go for it or will it stop me from playing Company of Heroes?

[Jonny2Bad]

Yeah, I've got 64bit disc staring right at me now. Should I go for it or will it stop me from playing Company of Heroes?
If it plays on vista it should be ok tbh. I am very tempted right now i must admit, but my xp is running just how i want it if im honest its spot on thats the only thing holding me back.

[Ash]

Well, I've now run it with the process priority at 'realtime' and it's improved slightly.

I'm off over to Novatech to pick up 8GB of Dominator ;)

http://www.theredline.co.uk/random/cb3.jpg

[Jonny2Bad]

Well, I've now run it with the process priority at 'realtime' and it's improved slightly.

I'm off over to Novatech to pick up 8GB of Dominator ;)

http://www.theredline.co.uk/random/cb3.jpg
Only worth it if your gonna change to vista 64bit buddy or you'll be wasting your money.

[{SAS}TB]

Xp 64 ftw ;)

[Ash]

Windows 7 64 actually. Here goes for the big install. Back later.:)

[{SAS}TB]

I couldnt get the 64 bit version to install - stuck with the 32 :S

[Ash]

Out of the box Windows 7 beta 64bit with 400 x 9

http://www.theredline.co.uk/random/cb4.jpg

I expect it to all go downhill from here.

[Jonny2Bad]

Nice oh so tempted to install this now.

[Jasonkruys]

CINEBENCH R10
************************************************** **
Processor : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 FX-60 Dual Core Processor
MHz : 2760
Number of CPUs : 2
Operating System : WINDOWS 64 BIT 5.2.3790
Graphics Card : Radeon X1950 Pro
Resolution : 800x600
Color Depth : RGB (8Bit)

************************************************** **

Rendering (Single CPU): 2620 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 4901 CB-CPU

Multiprocessor Speedup: 1.87

Shading (OpenGL Standard) : 4748 CB-GFX

************************************************** **

Score with my lowly system (as per sig)

[wuyanxu]

no worries, you'll beat us low spenders when you upgrade to i7. that must be a beast of a system when you first bought it, Fx60 wasn't cheap!

[Jasonkruys]

no worries, you'll beat us low spenders when you upgrade to i7. that must be a beast of a system when you first bought it, Fx60 wasn't cheap!

Yes, indeed, cost a few pennies at the time. I have an almost identical system sat next to it, except with an FX-55 and an X800PE...Bios is buggered, have been meaning to get round to ordering a new chip with bios on and use it as a server/media pc or something...

Those days are long gone, I'm afraid! Sat here wondering if I can manage with this system for another year!

[Ciber]

Stock speed on i7 920, as per sig:

[Sybex]

Here is my Results

[Callidus]

cest moi

http://i312.photobucket.com/albums/ll326/spongebob_squarebits/bag14.png


Cal

[{SAS}TB]

http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/6857/16065.jpg

[Vigoro]

CINEBENCH R10
************************************************** **

Tester : Vigoro

Processor : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
MHz : 3804.25
Number of CPUs : 4
Operating System : WINDOWS 32 BIT 5.1.2600

Graphics Card : ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series
Resolution : <fill this out>
Color Depth : <fill this out>

************************************************** **

Rendering (Single CPU): 3884 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 13626 CB-CPU

Multiprocessor Speedup: 3.51

Shading (OpenGL Standard) : 8653 CB-GFX


************************************************** **


Need 64 bit OS now :)

[system7]

Admit it guys. Quad core is useless. Except for running mutithreaded benchmarks. :biggrin:

Those extra cores still sit idle most of the time. £60 E5200 FTW. :thumbs:

[Vigoro]

Admit it guys. Quad core is useless. Except for running mutithreaded benchmarks. :biggrin:

Those extra cores still sit idle most of the time. £60 E5200 FTW. :thumbs:

I dont care ;)

and 4850's are useless aswell all you need is 4830 and a real processor :p

[Jonny2Bad]

WEll we got em now not too much point in gloating 7, and they still have more to them than just benchies, encoding etc. But cant take anything away from the 5200 out 1 in my stepdaughters machine 3.2ghz away we go lovely ;)

[wuyanxu]

Admit it guys. Quad core is useless. Except for running mutithreaded benchmarks. :biggrin:

Those extra cores still sit idle most of the time. £60 E5200 FTW. :thumbs:
Admit it guys.i7 is useless. Except for running mutithreaded benchmarks.

Those extra cores still sit idle most of the time. £160 Q6600 FTW.

daja vu?

[{SAS}TB]

looool


:thumbs:

[system7]

Admit it guys.i7 is useless. Except for running mutithreaded benchmarks.

Those extra cores still sit idle most of the time. £160 Q6600 FTW.

daja vu?
I do remember you started this thread in a sulk that you couldn't win SuperPi 1.5, Mr. Wu. :)

But I can't believe I ever said Q6600 FTW. When was that? :confused:

[wuyanxu]

if it's a problem with your quad vs dual, please take it elsewhere. the CPU forum perhaps.

this is the overclocking and benchmarking thread, so we only do those two here. usually do the first one before the second one ;)

[PaulyD]

Just found this thread, didn't realise it was here that Brad posted my result as he asked me to run Cinemark to compare to his and he said he posted it on a forum :D


My mate Pauls entry.

http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i214/bradbrown07_2006/Cinebench.jpg

Spec: Q9650 @ 4.41Ghz @ 1.392v, Asus Rampage Extreme, 4870x2 @850/1000, 2 x 500gb + 250Gb + 80Gb NAS, 4Gb G.Skills DDR3 @ 1569Mhz 7-7-7-18, Asus Xonar DX, TJ-07BW, Custom Water, Dell 2407WFP.

[skunksmash]

here's mine @ 3.5ghz ;)

456


:)SK

[Callidus]

Update :

well the i7 is sorted now, got a decent cooler thanks to Nelly so I'm now able to push it on benchies, currently at 4.2Ghz

http://i312.photobucket.com/albums/ll326/spongebob_squarebits/cbench.png

Cal

[skunksmash]

Update :

well the i7 is sorted now, got a decent cooler thanks to Nelly so I'm now able to push it on benchies, currently at 4.2Ghz

http://i312.photobucket.com/albums/ll326/spongebob_squarebits/cbench.png

Cal

my my.....you got that to 4.2ghz with HT enabled :drink: nice!!


:)SK

[Callidus]

cheers fella, yup very happy bunneh, HT + Turbo enabled and it's a C0 stepping only paid £175 for it currently at 1.4v for 4.2 been benching fine all morning will do a stability test tonight when I'm catching come Zzz's

[skunksmash]

cheers fella, yup very happy bunneh, HT + Turbo enabled and it's a C0 stepping only paid £175 for it currently at 1.4v for 4.2 been benching fine all morning will do a stability test tonight when I'm catching come Zzz's

I think that's the first time ive seen an i7 that high while running the full 8 cores ...... (& ive seen a few)

:biggrin: GREAT OC :biggrin:




:)SK

[Callidus]

lol I've seen a good few at 4.2 but usually D0 stepping, even more impressive is it being on air in an mATX rig ;) little box, big nads

[skunksmash]

lol I've seen a good few at 4.2 but usually D0 stepping, even more impressive is it being on air in an mATX rig ;) little box, big nads

most ppl i speak to who OC these chips say they struggle to OC them very far with HT enabled...... ive seen plenty of 4ghz+ i7 OCs, but only running 4 cores...



:)SK

[wuyanxu]

what cooler are you using?

[Callidus]

Same as you fella TRUE 120 extreme, single naff 120mm coolermaster fan pushing, I'm awaiting two yates to slip into push/pull. currently idling at 40

[wuyanxu]

scores updated: (in first post as well)
looks like Callidus is the only one in the skys at the moment.
http://i41.tinypic.com/akg0sl.jpg

sorry about forgot to upgrade. noticed it's been stickied, so i will update more often.

[erphy100]

Hi wuyanxu,
run @ 3.6GHz.

http://forum.novatech.co.uk/picture.php?albumid=26&pictureid=151

Result, 21216.

erphy.

[scrivz69]

Heres mine at stock,i think it needs tweaking.:)

[erphy100]

Heres mine at stock,i think it needs tweaking.:)

Hi,
Mine was in the 17000s @ stock 2.93GHz, you may need a miner tweak.(maybe).

erphy.:)

Ps. Hope this makes you feel better scivz69.
run @2.93GHz.

[scrivz69]

Hi,
Mine was in the 17000s @ stock 2.93GHz, miner tweak maybe.

erphy.:)


Cheers mate i know i just got to work out this bios to sort it out.:biggrin:

[Ciber]

Here is mine at 4.0 ghz, I'm wondering how much faster it would be in 64 bit.

[Callidus]

Here is mine at 4.0 ghz, I'm wondering how much faster it would be in 64 bit.


an easy and cost free way to find out would be to download the 64bit RC version of windows 7


Cal

[Ciber]

Can't be arsed to install it yet!

[gurusan]

http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/44/capturewmn.png

[Ciber]

So I went ahead and installed windows 7 RC 64 bit on a partition on my data hard drive and did the 64 bit test. Looks like a nice improvement there. Look forward to the release of windows 7 so I can go 64 bit full time!

http://i39.tinypic.com/309sx8p.jpg

[Urrys Currys]

ok. done this with my old laptop... just incase i screw up... just about to try on my alienware... post back with edit in 5 mins.

UPDATE: sry long time ago i posted this.

heres my results. 23275 :) not bad? for a laptop :P check sig.

P.S: just got fallout 3 for PC. :P

[wuyanxu]

@Urrys Currys, can you post a screenshot of your results please? with the frequency of your CPU clearly shown.

there is no way a 2.5Ghz quad core can perform on-par to 4Ghz i7.

[erphy100]

Cheers mate i know i just got to work out this bios to sort it out.:biggrin:
Hi scrivz,
Like the new sig, nice Suzie, the one on the far left. Mind the one in the middle is not bad.
As for the far right, I'm not even going there.:)
erphy.

[Callidus]

@Urrys Currys, can you post a screenshot of your results please? with the frequency of your CPU clearly shown.

there is no way a 2.5Ghz quad core can perform on-par to 4Ghz i7.

Agreed something very not right there lol

[ViRuS2k]

Thought i would give this test a run as i have run every other test LOL

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/1405/cinebenchm.jpg

4.2 HT :)

[Ciber]

Nice result. Makes me wish I had waited for D0, but I needed to get my PC working properly. :)

[ViRuS2k]

does this thread get updated ? lol

[wuyanxu]

yes, i was just waiting for Urrys Currys to post screenshot of his results so i can order it and post it.

don't worry, it's been monitored closely, my local file is up to date.

[ViRuS2k]

yes, i was just waiting for Urrys Currys to post screenshot of his results so i can order it and post it.

don't worry, it's been monitored closely, my local file is up to date.

Nice,

Here is a update to my score, 24xxx ;)

http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/7298/79473505.jpg

:rocker:

[wuyanxu]

how did you manage to get 1k points out of the same overclock?


btw, updated first post.

http://i44.tinypic.com/23kcdw0.jpg

[ViRuS2k]

used tighter timeings.
+ 1 pic is from vista x64 the other is from win7 x64 ;)

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

i think ill rep AMD here, stock p2 940 was

11981 didnt take a screen of this so take my word for it :)

atm untill i get a better cooler im running it as stock but i've also run it @ 3.4, the 940 is EASILY capable of running at 3.4-6 24/7 so in that light these arent 'extreme' benching clocks, if i cba i could take it to 3.8 (i had my system at this 24/7 over jan-end of april) but i cba to mess about to much and its simple to up the multi with AOD so its a bit of fun.. @ 3.8 and oc ram i think the 940 could hit 17,000ish

@ 3.4
http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv318/I3R0K3N7FEET/Untitled-1.jpg
edit< oops, i forgot, i should've run cpuz alongside the screen... .. hmm well ill redo it on demand if i must :)
also wuyanxu maybe you should drop the 24/7 clocks rule and let this be an all out benching thread?

[wuyanxu]

your motherboard chipset and RAM speed please?

i'll edit the first post, since there are quite a few that is running at ridiculous speeds anyway. feel free to do an extreme overclock.

[I3R0K3N7FEET]

its my sig< was running at 800 mhz 4-4-4-12 timings, mobo is asus m3a79t deluxe ie chipset is> 790FX,

i just ran it @ 3.7ghz with 900mhz ram< same tmings and scored 18122, but i got BSOD before i could do anything ill run it again later... and post some screens, its pretty good considering its sitting just above a stock i7.

[Kenman]

Just found this topic, after doing a search for Cinebench, thinking it was something new. :agree: NT Forum beat me to it.
Anyway here are my results

Processor : AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 940 Processor
MHz : 3.5
Number of CPUs : 4
Operating System : WINDOWS 64 BIT 6.0.6002

Graphics Card : ATI Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 512 MB
Resolution : <1600 x 900>
Color Depth : <32>

************************************************** **

Rendering (Single CPU): 3832 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 13730 CB-CPU

Multiprocessor Speedup: 3.58

Shading (OpenGL Standard) : 5922 CB-GFX

[UseItNow]

Will definitely give this a run on a cheap upgrade I'm looking at putting together at the moment.

Intel E4500 (@ stock)
Gigabyte G31 M/B
Ballistix 2Gb Kit DDR2 800MHz
WD 320Gb HDD (Older model, 2 platter)
Using onboard graphics.

[Duke]

19408

Intel i5 750 @ 3.8

http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/1124/cinebenchi5.jpg

[Jasonkruys]

My new efforts, i7 920 @ 3.78GHz = 22,173:

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a347/JasonKruys/cinebench.jpg

[wuyanxu]

lol i5 without hyperthreading isn't doing very good.

i've lost the excel file, going to re-do it in the next few weeks, please bare with me

[Duke]

Yeah any encoding software that takes full advantage of all cores, HT, etc will do well. I think the HT on the Core i7 is meant to be a big improvement over the old P4 HT tech too.

[{SAS}TB]

http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/8600/cvine.png

First run of i7 @ 3.99 :D (with ATI x600Pro :P)

[{SAS}TB]

http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/2620/cinie.png

[{SAS}TB]

eeked a few more points with some better ram timings:

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/2620/cinie.png

edit And with Priority to "High"

http://img122.imageshack.us/img122/2620/cinie.png

[Naphta]

http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/4784/cinebenchi.png

[Lord_x]

http://uploadpicturesonline.com/files/9ignewlrpgk8v4m3rzgm.jpg

[Naphta]

24754 is my top so far, ill post a screenshot later.